李俊杰
发表于 2007-10-30 13:00:41
新手学习,感觉好新奇阿!谢谢
天生我才
发表于 2007-10-30 22:03:18
今天开眼了,不过有点看不懂。
mjhls
发表于 2007-10-31 08:12:14
好东西?能配一些说明更好!
mjhls
发表于 2007-10-31 08:16:02
建议在必威体育网址杂志上集中介绍各种发动机的应用场合及原理简要介绍?
放下
发表于 2007-10-31 11:33:46
谢谢
楼主
可否将发动机德工作原理附加上
让我们大家学学啊
rdalan
发表于 2007-12-3 20:35:07
好东西 ,绝对好!~~~~谢谢~~
向左看齐
发表于 2007-12-4 10:34:48
还有这种
向左看齐
发表于 2007-12-4 10:44:16
我觉得比较有希望的一个.
向左看齐
发表于 2007-12-4 10:50:08
很久以来,聪明的机械设计师们设计出了很多种发动机形式,但是总是没有哪个能够革了活塞发动机的命.现在权当是一种艺术品来欣赏吧.
看看这个.E文的评价不是我写的哦.
This design took a hell of alot of work. He has a running prototype, it has alot of great animations and material on the website with regards to this design. I truly congratulate this individual for coming up with an alternate design and then making it work.
However (and there always is a however), designer seems hell-bent to keep certain ideas that he had from the beginning of the design, most notably not using oil lubrication or water cooling. His test runs work, but this will melt down without oil & water.
This is a real example of where I feel the designer does not seem to realize that 70% of the energy created by combustion is hitting un-moveable walls, the force/area problem I've talked of before. I believe there is a good reason that no performance figures are noted anywhere for torque or horsepower, and that is because these numbers are poor. My bet is that this design is LESS efficient than a regular Briggs & Stratton engine. Just a guess.
UPDATED 11/15/2002
On further review, this is a nice design, not a rotary (and does not claim to be) but a QuasiTurbine (as the name implies). And, unfortunately, simply another way to burn fuel.
向左看齐
发表于 2007-12-4 10:52:37
这个叫EM2(2是平方)
This is a true rotary engine, whereas combustion causes spinning of a wheel.
I'd love to hear that there was a working prototype of this model, but no information shows that there is.
页:
1
2
3
4
[5]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14