ValleyViews 发表于 2015-10-8 02:22 1 l! D2 @( l4 E9 S* m
四海之内皆兄弟也。. _; L" u7 E `# n
Talking about your explanation, I think that every sent ...
5 A; Q5 M* E3 O1 R- I" [9 O# W大侠,多谢跟我讨论这个问题。:D 小弟联系方式已经站内信PM大侠) L |6 ?2 ~ r6 r! T1 `/ T
6 J% `" |; h! n$ M1 A" M
As for the problem of line element, I still consider it as a 2D element. I may misunderstand something. I will appreciate your instruction if you can give me more explanation about it. " l% G4 {0 r* q" W7 G 6 S* |- o/ H' ^- [& gI just got an idea about this problem. Did you want to tell me that the line elements measured in the actual components can be torqued or twisted, so they may have 3 dimensions?
aysuio 发表于 2015-10-8 02:47 C7 J% W$ ?+ p2 W
大侠,多谢跟我讨论这个问题。:D 小弟联系方式已经站内信PM大侠# R$ x4 K8 n& e7 s
As for the problem of line eleme ...
4 ~4 Z* w2 ]5 h6 q0 P& U+ c我个人很喜欢这个帖子,其问题本身的重要性暂时可以超过其结论。还希望楼主大侠帮助我和大家共同学习提高。7 x/ u7 n0 H2 A+ B; W4 d. s3 y
; _7 b" v' }2 U8 j XPut it in this way, one single line element in a specified view could be considered as a 2d line, but multiple line elements in same view and in certain interval can establish a cluster of lines that can be considered as a kind of 3d image. Furthermore, multiple cross line elements in front view and side view can set up a net construction image that will be able to describe the flatness well enough. That's why some persons think that the new version Y14.5 would regulate the cross views straightness equal to flatness of a planar surface.
aysuio 发表于 2015-10-7 05:02 : \0 R6 p1 O5 j% i4 GHi, Valleyviews,8 r$ D9 u% i7 d
) O& _! e! a' ^2 l$ }# O; q
You were saying the fig in Y14.5-2009. And yes, it is talking about this problem ...
( a( ~& A8 B, n( tThink about this problem really helps. I have to say that thank you for your good job. Have a nice weekend, - A4 q+ J6 g0 | d