机械必威体育网址

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 6346|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

公差,这两种标注,表示意义有什么区别的?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2014-5-23 20:05:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
这两种标注,表示意义有什么区别的?

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册会员

x
回复

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 2014-5-23 20:19:55 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 HC小丁 于 2014-5-23 20:22 编辑 ! ~. t$ ~$ o4 |. z& n, ]+ z" u+ m

: K+ s" p" b; D! z8 }# {基本尺寸不一样,实际加工尺寸可能是一样的,但设计尺寸不同
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 2014-5-23 20:57:54 | 只看该作者
前一种标法,尺寸两侧分别加工成型,如铣或磨削两个侧面;后一种标法一般用于一个刀具完成的加工成型,如钻孔,砂轮磨槽。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 2014-5-23 21:00:35 | 只看该作者
对于我们加工的来说:左图我们会尽量把尺寸做到20.45至20.5之间: _6 I4 n$ x0 @# n2 G+ Q3 H, E
                              右图我们会尽量把尺寸做到20.4至20.45之间- c2 y1 o* ~% d% e' e& \9 q) R6 L$ B0 Y
                便于装配
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2014-5-23 22:20:44 | 只看该作者
是不是根据入体原则来的?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2014-5-23 22:56:22 | 只看该作者
长见识了,我原先以为是个人的习惯问题,
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 2014-5-24 10:31:03 | 只看该作者
一般是另一个部件的基本尺寸一样的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2014-5-26 23:12:49 | 只看该作者
9.2.3 Converting Dimensions to Equal Bilateral Tolerances
4 b8 E: ]  A3 q# l) {
In Fig. 9-2, there were several dimensions that were toleranced using unilateral tolerances
7 j0 F4 P' @  Z. {( p  u(such as .375 +.000/-.031,  3.019 +.012/-.000 and .438 +.000/-.015) or unequal bilateral tolerances (such
, K2 K) Q0 Q1 t+ W1 Xas +1.500 +.010/-.004 ). If we look at the length of the shaft, we see that there are several different ways we
) o/ `" R- ^/ F* A0 F2 w; |. pcould have applied the tolerances. Fig. 9-4 shows several ways we can dimension and tolerance the length& U$ A, I4 M7 m6 n) p
of the shaft to achieve the same upper and lower tolerance limits (3.031/3.019). From a design perspective,
5 ?$ G9 {) T  p, V, T5 Tall of these methods perform the same function. They give a boundary within which the dimension is: E' f, ^: P, a" T) g6 G' c9 s# Q
acceptable.
( i& X* B9 i( o# i7 |; t* B
% S" T$ t0 e! ?5 t* R$ GThe designer might think that changing the nominal dimension has an effect on the assembly. For
3 p5 k  L6 y2 S. h$ _. L$ I- {example, a designer may dimension the part length as 3.019 +.012/-.000. In doing so, the designer may
+ d/ e4 Z- ^+ U1 _# s) M7 C' v+ X, wfalsely think that this will help minimize the gap for Requirement 1. A drawing, however, doesn’t give
, u  n) Q% _/ i( z6 Z2 A) n: i& ]preference to any dimension within the tolerance range.
! J; V' f3 v& F4 `' N5 Z8 R# K5 }2 L+ CFig. 9-5 shows what happens to the manufacturing yield if the manufacturer “aims” for the dimension( r0 G' Q5 l' `; J& q: P
stated on the drawing and the process follows the normal distribution. In this example, if the manufacturer
6 D( q) `! k  f) v0 Haimed for 3.019, half of the parts would be outside of the tolerance zone. Since manufacturing shops want
5 x* N/ @0 p5 q8 ?0 R3 v  b! ato maximize the yield of each dimension, they will aim for the nominal that yields the largest number of
- B) t- y5 l9 r+ g& H5 p! T- D& igood parts. This helps them minimize their costs. In this example, the manufacturer would aim for 3.025.
5 b  H; ?- V/ r# U0 Q4 F0 YThis allows them the highest probability of making good parts. If they aimed for 3.019 or 3.031, half of the  `% X0 E7 c3 P2 ]- M9 o6 ]0 K9 ~
manufactured parts would be outside the tolerance limits.6 w# q4 A: N% E# A* s  R- r# _' o
As in the previous example, many manufacturing processes are normally distributed. Therefore, if we
# v( T2 I( ?( ^4 r! F) Q( ~put any unilateral, or unequal bilateral tolerances on dimensions, the manufacturer would convert them to, n( `! Z1 k, o& Y% R
a mean dimension with an equal bilateral tolerance. The steps for converting to an equal bilateral tolerance% F4 ^* N' T( P/ \3 w/ S0 o: X
follow.
3 s& b" C% w) |" \" z# X; u% O2 |
- J1 t' {. b) T2 b# s% r
# e8 I( W3 q+ m/ z1 w% W3 Q1. Convert the dimension with tolerances to an upper limit and a lower limit. (For example, 3.028 +.003/
4 c6 O  v, w+ n0 @& [' o! Q-.009 has an upper limit of 3.031 and a lower limit of 3.019.)
9 b3 A, g& d, r: I+ m2. Subtract the lower limit from the upper limit to get the total tolerance band. (3.031-3.019=.012)
" o. L7 |7 y/ p3. Divide the tolerance band by two to get an equal bilateral tolerance. (.012/2=.006)# t  ?: L0 ^( d4 V* P
4. Add the equal bilateral tolerance to the lower limit to get the mean dimension. (3.019 +.006=3.025).
6 a  v3 F/ F- F* x$ A/ }0 SAlternately, you could subtract the equal bilateral tolerance from the upper limit. (3.031-.006=3.025)8 w5 U+ g- B( |* e, C, Y5 \
! I; ~  b2 ]0 s, c2 b% @
As a rule, designers should use equal bilateral tolerances. Sometimes, using equal bilateral tolerances
& d; Y3 T6 L# ^, B; Y4 m' Hmay force manufacturing to use nonstandard tools.  In these cases, we should not use equal bilateral) m( C. I# j% T, q3 s6 Y
tolerances.  For example, we would not want to convert a drilled hole diameter from Æ.125 +.005/-.001 to0 E. B# |1 U$ e7 Y& c" S' M
Æ.127 ±.003. In this case, we want the manufacturer to use a standard Æ.125 drill. If the manufacturer sees
" l, H6 Q' C5 y- o( i0 T; uÆ.127 on a drawing, he may think he needs to build a special tool. In the case of drilled holes, we would
/ u# f6 A7 r5 e. n3 t% W3 e1 \also want to use an unequal bilateral tolerance because the mean of the drilling process is usually larger
1 E; H8 R2 b# c% k( ethan the standard drill size. These dimensions should have a larger plus tolerance than minus tolerance.
4 Q" L- t) y0 {; k* [+ ZAs we will see later, when we convert dimensions to equal bilateral tolerances, we don’t need to keep( M$ D. V, A1 s% ]' ^
track of which tolerances are “positive” and which tolerances are “negative” because the positive toler-
& _' }& ?$ D+ p  |8 ?6 Gances are equal to the negative tolerances. This makes the analysis easier. Table 9-1 converts the neces-
( y( V8 z* L! \+ ^" F8 ]sary dimensions and tolerances to mean dimensions with equal bilateral tolerances.
1 \3 N) s" Q1 ~& M2 B+ }! j& c: Z1 r$ O. Q# C/ }6 V2 H- W
$ v( y# ~2 U9 t# r/ V( a
"Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook, by Paul J. Drake, Jr."
3 R/ L8 K; }2 G. [" j

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册会员

x

点评

9-2表中的尺寸有的具有零位偏差,有的尺寸有正负偏差。若只看轴的尺寸,可见有多种标注公差的方式。 9-4表中,尺寸的上下偏差计算值相同,但是标注不同。从设计师角度看,结果一样的。  发表于 2014-5-30 16:57
这么吊,英文啊  发表于 2014-5-29 20:44
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2014-5-27 08:32:12 | 只看该作者
我来看看高手们怎么说,我对这些太不熟悉了,这几天看书貌似看懂了,其实还是不懂
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2014-5-27 16:02:09 | 只看该作者
左图,尺寸尽量避开20.4
( ~' U" B$ o, ]  y: {# K右图,尽量把尺寸避开20.5

点评

恩,我也有这么个想法,但不知怎么讲的,看你你说的顿时感觉就是这个意思  发表于 2014-5-29 20:45
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|机械必威体育网址 ( 京ICP备10217105号-1,京ICP证050210号,浙公网安备33038202004372号 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 09:53 , Processed in 0.055123 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表