机械必威体育网址

标题: Should I Become a Design Engineer or an Engineering Analyst? [打印本页]

作者: eddyzhang 时间: 2015-10-1 23:26
标题: Should I Become a Design Engineer or an Engineering Analyst?
下面是一个专业人士给的一个建议，原文地址链接：
https://caeai.com/blog/should-i-become-design-engineer-or-engineering-analyst

Roughly twenty-five years ago when finite element analysis was becoming mainstream, the career path for a young engineer led to a distinct fork in the road: Are you going to become a designer or an analyst? The designer's role was to lay out the new and innovative design concepts.  The analyst’s job was to make sure they worked. The designer was the idea guy who would create on the back of an envelope. The analyst was the guy who could derive partial differential equations and cleverly simplify complex problems into 2-d analytical models.

With today’s advances in software and hardware, the difference between designer and analyst is a lot less clear-cut.  The most effective designers leverage early adoption of analytical models, such that the first pass prototypes are more efficient and reliable.  The analyst can take advantage of tools like design optimization to not just provide a pass/fail response, but play a major role in shaping the final design.  In both scenarios, the key to success is proper education in their expanded roles.  The designer needs to understand the physics behind the FEA / CFD solutions and the analyst needs to understand the “big picture” design goals.

With the continued adoption of 3D Printing, many limitations related to fabrication have been removed.  More innovative analytical-based geometrical solutions can now become real design solutions.  Analytical tools have become faster and easier to use so that the combined designer and analyst can quickly assess a prototype’s viability.  The new AIM platform launched by ANSYS is a tool specifically developed for this type of application.  In this example, the SpaceClaim concept modeling geometry tool is coupled with the ANSYS Multiphysics analytical tool to allow the engineer to expand their capabilities into both domains.  New analysis-based geometry can be ported directly to the 3D Printer.  Up-front analytical modeling will reduce the physical prototyping and produce a more reliable product.  For example, local stress concentration areas susceptible to early fatigue failure can be engineered out of the part from the start.

The blurring of the dividing line between analyst and designer is also showing up in the current job market. Educational requirements and pay for entry level opportunities for both design engineers and engineering analysts are very similar.  (Not that pay should be a determining factor in entering any profession!) I once was asked by a young engineer: “Which would pay me more in the long term? Continue with my education and get my Ph.D., or start working now after I just finished my Masters?” My response:  “Go get an MBA instead and go into finance if all you care about is money, because unless you love solving problems you should not be an engineer!” I am not saying that you can’t make an excellent living as an engineer, but finding a profession that you love is much more important than money for happiness.

So, for all those problem solvers out there, the future looks bright!  With a host of new tools available to innovate, whether you decide to call yourself a designer or an analyst, educate yourself first on the fundamentals and then embrace these new tools.  We need your creativity to develop better engineered innovations.

作者: ValleyViews 时间: 2015-10-2 01:23
I agree with the writer. However, there exist a lot of conflicts between real self and ideal self.

作者: 阳光小院暖茶 时间: 2015-10-2 06:20
What the hell is it?

作者: wdennisw 时间: 2015-10-2 07:29
from my piont, a designer should have both of them.

作者: 东海fyh126 时间: 2015-10-2 09:41
cao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

作者: chase_1987 时间: 2015-10-2 09:58
同意，设计工程师和分析工程师的界限将会越来越模糊。随着软件的发展，分析可能成为设计工程师的必备技能。

作者: 李二洋 时间: 2015-10-2 10:58

东海fyh126 发表于 2015-10-2 09:41 : T: b: a! n, H8 y c; X
cao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

dui

作者: 咖咖啡 时间: 2015-10-2 14:01
apparently，in the world ,the engineer in mechanical industry is't rich ,
hollyshit

作者: -[.赱.開. 时间: 2015-10-2 15:59
I agree with what you said,' finding a profession that you love is much more important than money for happiness'.

作者: 一展刀锋 时间: 2015-10-2 19:09
learn the basic knowledge well, and then you can work on both

作者: 迷茫的维修 时间: 2015-10-2 21:31
goog good study .day day up

作者: 迷路的熊 时间: 2015-10-2 21:37
the question is still here.if I can't earn enough money.how could I insist to be an engineer.otherwise,Mba or finance may be good for me,but I already decide to learn computer.

作者: 祺哈哈哈 时间: 2015-10-3 13:11
i think a good engineer require not only design but also analyst ability…if someone is poor at either of them,he might meet giant obstacle druing his design process

作者: HUGO97 时间: 2015-10-5 17:11
@2266998

作者: threetigher 时间: 2015-10-5 21:48

东海fyh126 发表于 2015-10-2 09:41
* p5 [) ?" c N; `cao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

哈哈。大小写，单复数，is't, 不胜枚举，太烂了。

WTF！

No more zhuangbility, erbility or shability!

Because zhuangbility leads to leipility!

欢迎光临机械必威体育网址 (//www.szfco.com/)