标题: solidworks 的快捷方式真的能提高效率吗 [打印本页] 作者: 寂静天花板 时间: 2015-6-2 16:08 标题: solidworks 的快捷方式真的能提高效率吗 Life is full of shortcuts but those typically don't work out well for anyone. Well that’s not the case with SOLIDWORKS shortcuts. There are many places to use shortcuts in parts and sketches. 1 _' d' P- ?* q8 XThink about how you create a model in SOLIDWORKS. You choose a sketch plane, start a sketch, find a sketch entity to use, add some dimensions, then extrude that sketch into a feature. You do this over and over again until the model is created. But during that process are you being as efficient as you can be? Are you using any SOLIDWORKS shortcuts? Well I hope you are. # A! Z; C/ x6 L; A+ D1 n/ oWhen I’m teaching, I emphasis SOLIDWORKS shortcuts. I say they really will help get your design done quicker but I never really had any data to put behind it. So I figured that I would model the same part 2 different ways. One way I would model using my typical shortcuts and the other would be with none. I timed myself modeling both ways to see which one was faster. I also downloaded 2 tools to help track my mouse movements. One shows where my mouse has been with a black line and the other tracks the distance in feet that my mouse has traveled. - b9 q, ^4 H5 N作者决定来个对比，用普通方式操作，和用快捷方式操作，并找到两个工具可以记录鼠标指针的移动痕迹。事例文件如下7 }: s( U+ J; d! C# z, {! ]- L
[attach]355309[/attach]4 @/ V* P' q1 D Y& ^6 l/ p. ?
The first model I used my typical, everyday SOLIDWORKS shortcuts. These are some hot-keys (i.e. “L” for line & “D” for dimension), mouse gestures, and the shortcut tool bar (“S” key). ) E% }, r6 [$ A) V首先是使用各种快捷方式的操作) I: z! ^* o& W: Y7 _0 d/ W0 @
[attach]355310[/attach]: c( o6 P- C: u; r: j( T
It took me 226 seconds to model it and my mouse traveled 28 feet. That isn't too bad as a good base value. Here is what the mouse path graphic looks like.花了226秒完成建模，鼠标移动总位移28英尺。 2 j( N* n' ^( _& q0 e6 [9 ~* aYou can see that my mouse really stayed in the middle of my screen right where my model is. I didn't need to move to the command manager for anything. 你也能看到鼠标指针的移动痕迹比较均匀对称 # v) K/ X d; N$ A1 [Now let’s look at the one where I didn't use any SOLIDWORKS shortcuts. I knew that this one would be slower and I would have a lot more mouse movement.下面是不使用快捷方式的操作，不用想，肯定慢。. U3 ^. F: p; w- D4 o
[attach]355311[/attach] ) z! k: g' _9 {, W2 A7 n0 ^: x HIt took me 421 seconds to model it and my mouse moves 103 feet. Here is the mouse path graphic / b4 ^4 G5 ^1 l& e9 L4 I花了421秒完成建模，鼠标指针移动总位移103英尺。 ' p8 Z2 k5 Y6 E4 h: J" q As you can see, my mouse spent more time on the property manager and command manager than in the graphics area.正如你所看到的，鼠标指针大部分时间是在图形区域间移动。 6 W$ N/ A& @7 n3 j& r[attach]355312[/attach] : `2 ~2 b# d' o6 P2 g* f; r% {Let’s take a look at the numbers. I can see that I had a savings of 46% in time and 73% in mouse movement by using SOLIDWORKS shortcuts. 让我们看看这些数字，我可以看到使用快捷方式节省了46%的时间和73%的鼠标指针位移。 ( [+ x0 P* o9 S/ l+ U' \* w$ ?洋人的思维果然跟咱们不一样，咱们是操作下来，感觉快了就认同快捷方式的确省时间，但人家一定要做个实验，记录数据，通过计算来证明。当然我们也可以说这家伙闲的蛋疼 0 L; W8 \+ y+ C @) o4 f& _- d' }7 @7 _( G# P" G7 j
6 Q( l) C! V: B. Q1 h1 ^7 u j 作者: 栾海军 时间: 2015-6-2 16:15
够直观 也得是根据个人喜欢 喝习惯来作者: ryouss 时间: 2015-6-2 16:25
謝謝寂大提供參考數據作者: hc2003 时间: 2015-6-2 19:53
洋人那叫“用事实说话”，记得原来单位买了一个 很普通的塑料桶（就像楼房里存自来水的那种水桶，带个盖子，通常是红色和蓝色的）) z0 l6 P' H/ Q
同上没有刻度，也没有容量啥的；送货的人所100L；那个奥地利的老外就特较真，去试验室找个大量杯，一杯杯倒水；最终终于搞准了，装满水只有70多升； ; w9 |" w% h& @: z- k 正式国内的这种差不多，大概，才是国内制造和国外制造的差距
