英文三坐标必威APP精装版下载的一点翻译
最近慢慢翻译英文三坐标必威APP精装版下载的帖子,看看外国人特别是北美人如何看待不同的三坐标以及他们的水平,需求刚开始翻译,手有点生,主要是意译.如果写的不明白还请众兄弟们见谅
[ 本帖最后由 吟啸徐行 于 2009-3-7 20:19 编辑 ] Welcome to CMM Talk
The Cyberspace Community for CMM Professionals
欢迎来到 CMM 必威APP精装版下载
CMM 专业人士的网上交流必威APP精装版下载
View Press Release
主要观点
About CMM Talk: The premier cyberspace community dedicated to the tens of thousands of CMM Programmers and Professional Users of CMM's in North America.
有关 CMM 必威APP精装版下载： 北美最好的必威APP精装版下载,它专注服务于万名CMM 程序师和专业使用者。
CMM Talk Mission: "To create, manage and maintain a professional independent cyberspace location for the CMM community to visit for enrichment of their own knowledge while passing on their experiences and knowledge to fellow professionals"
CMM 必威APP精装版下载宗旨：创建,管理并维护一个专业,独立的必威APP精装版下载.通过具有丰富经验和知识的访问者在此传递交流各自的经验.
Available Resources:
可用的资源：
The CMM Talk user forum is divided into the following categories:
CMM 必威APP精装版下载分为一下几个区：
General - The area for all miscellaneous discussions that are not appropriate for the numerous specific forums.
大杂烩－为没有专门划分区而提供的一个讨论区
Hardware - CMM and Portable - Forums exist for users of the numerous CMM and Portable hardware brands. The intent of this forum is to discuss CMM hardware, service and associated issues and experiences.
硬件－ CMM 和便携式的－ 存在很多桥式和便携式牌子分区。分区将讨论 CMM 硬件、服务,与之相关的费用和经验。
Software - Forums exist for most popular CMM software packages.Forums are intended to exchange ideas, experiences, questions and relevant answers
软件－这个分区存在主流的CMM 软件。分区目的为交换主意，经验， 疑问和相关的答案
Sensors - This is the location to exchange probing information, ideas, "tips" etc from Renishaw to Zeiss and others.
测头－这个分区主要是交流测头,探针信息等.包括 Renishaw , Zeiss 和其他者。
Fixturing - Forums to discuss and share your part fixturing ideas, experiences, concerns and solutions.
夹具－分区讨论并且分享夹具观点、经验、疑问和结果
CMM Calibration - The forum to discuss CMM Calibration ideas experiences, concerns and solutions.
CMM 校准－必威APP精装版下载讨论 CMM 校准的经验、疑问和结果。
SPC and GD&T - Forums to share your issues, knowledge and experiences in the areas of SPC and GD&T.
SPC 和 GD＆T －分区分享你在在 SPC 和 GD＆T中的观点,知识和经验
Code Samples - The area to share your code solutions with others and to exchange ideas to help improve your applications.
语言规章－分区分享你与其他人的规则解决,同时交换观点以利于提高应用(主要是关于dmis三坐标语言和vb/c类编程语言)
Operating Systems - The location to discuss various operating system experiences, problems and solutions.
操作系统－讨论各种不同的操作系统经验、问题和解决。
Buy/Sell - Surplus equipment can be listed and specific equipment needs posted.
买／卖－包括出售设备和需求设备
Employment - Job vacancies can be posted along with the resume of CMM professionals seeking employment.
职场天地－企业工作的空缺,和专业人士寻求雇主。
News and Events - Hyperlinks to relevant CMM articles in Magazines, Trade Shows event schedule and other industry relevant links.
新闻 －与三坐标相关的杂志,内部信息和其他部门之间的链接.
24/7 Chat - Allows instantaneous exchange of ideas and experiences in a simple chat based environment
24/7 谈天－即时交换和经验 Life Expectancy of a new PH10M and a refurbished one
新的和修复后的 PH10 M 的平均寿命?
What is it? I replaced my PH10M with a RBE 3 years ago. Now I need to replace it again. What gives?
什么？ 我 3 年前从 RBE 更换我的 PH10 M 。 现在我需要再次更换它。 什么原因？
couple factors influence the life expectancy of a PH9/10 probe head.
Crashes, probe indexing frequency and the power being supplied to the controller. I have seen some PH9's last a good 10 years+ and others go 3 years because they get abused. Are you sure it's the probe head that is buggered and not the internal head cable in your machine?
一些因素影响 PH9/ph10 测头的平均寿命。
撞击，使用频率和测量时力度。 我曾经见到一些 PH9 正常工作10 多年,而另外一些不足3年因为他们没有被正确使用你确定它是测头故障而不是机器内部的电缆？
Yes, it's the head. I took the head off the column, checked all my connections. What was happening, at 90,0, while measuring as point in the -Y direction, the head would unseat. At first I thought it was the TP200 or module. I put in another TP200 and module, and it unseated again at 90,0. This machine has been running roughly 18 hours a day measuring the same part. It has not seen a crash ever (to the best of my knowledge).
Just got an RBE this morning. It now works as it should.
是的，是测头。 我从立柱上拆掉了测头，检查我所有的连接。 故障状态是:在 90,0角度时, 在－Y方向测量点的时候，测头不能抬起。 起先，我认为故障的是TP200 或模块。我换上另外的TP200 和模块，在 90,0角度时,它同样不能就位. 这部机器一天大概18小时测量相同的零件。 它还不有发生一次的猛烈撞击。（据我说知）
仅仅是今天早晨换了一个测头从RBE.它现在正常工作。
[ 本帖最后由 吟啸徐行 于 2009-3-9 20:19 编辑 ] 从测头这块开始翻译,争取每天翻译一点........
I'm looking into the Renishaw SP25. I understand this has good qualities when it comes to scanning. I do a fair amount of scanning. However, I'm not sure about the calibration cycle, and time. I'm referring to the time required to qualify a styli change, and new A-B angles.
I'd like hear from anyone already using the SP25, on any system.
我正在考察 Renishaw SP25 。 我知道当扫描的时候它有很好的特征。 我要做一定量的扫描。 然而，我不能确认校准周期和时间。 我指的校准周期是探针值变化和使用新的AB角度。
我想要听些已经使用 SP25的人意见, 不管任何系统上
。
You might refer to this. It is pretty time consuming. Maybe 10-20 times longer that a traditional trigger probe?? Just a guess on that.
http://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1
你可能会涉及这。时间是相当长。可能一个传统的接触测头的10-20倍长？只是在那上的一个猜测。
http://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1
Yes the calibration of the SP25M is time consuming, about 4 mins per probe due to the fact it repeats the routine twice to determine the scanning probe factors. I am very impressed with the probes accuracy on my Mitutoyo Crysta.
是的 SP25 M 的校准是非常耗费时间的，大约 4 分钟每一探头角度,事实上它重复常规的两次来确定扫描探针.在Mitutoyo Crysta 上其精度给我留下深刻的印象。
I am using SP25M with Mcosmos, the accuracy is very good but the time difference is as previously suggested - 15/20 seconds per probe position touch trigger, 4:30 - 5 mins per position scanning factors.
The scanning times can be changed but the setting used depends on the accuracy req'd
However,I do not find the calibration time a problem as I use the scheduler in the software to run the program lights out during sunday.
The cmm should be verified in accordance with the following spec'n :-
"ISO 10360-4:2000
Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines Part 4: CMMs used in scanning measuring mode"
我正在使用SP25M和Mcosmos(三丰软件) ，精度非常好，但是时间不同意上面两位:15/20倍常规接触测头,4-5分一个测头角度 。扫描时间是可以改变的，但是使用设定取决于精度
然而，我并没发现校准时间是一个问题,我使用软件中的程序直到周末关灯为止。
cmm 应该符合下列的标准
ISO 10360-4:2000
三坐标认可和校验测试4: CMMs中使用扫描测头”
With the latest release of the Renishaw scanning calibration DLL, Renishaw have reduced the scanning probe calibration times by 35% Using a calibration speed of 20mm/sec, it is now possible to calibrate and qualify a tip in 2 minutes.
The added benifits of an SP25 are probe lengths of 400mm and the capacity to collect so much more information about the part's shape as well as size.
Renishaw扫描校准最新的新闻链接， Renishaw在使用校准速度在20mm／sec的前提下,已经减少校准时间35%,比较可能的是校准同时通过一个角度需要2分钟
SP25 的附加杆最大为400 毫米和更多的能力收集零件外形。
决定性的
If you are worried about the time it takes to calibrate the probes the easiest thing to do is generate a probe cal routine in MCOSMOS and run on the weekend. It's easy!
如果你担忧校准测头的时间,最简单的就是在周末在MCOSMOS中调用测头并运行.非常容易！ 兄弟辛苦了，和你不一样，我喜欢去http://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/register.php?a=act&u=86413&i=66568274 前辈，辛苦了~ does probe ball dia affects the measurent?because i have a probe with 2 mm dia and its giving 3 microns error but as i use the 6 mm ball dia probe , the error goes to 10 microns (its stem length is also bigger than the previous probe).
billabong
标准球直径是否影响测量？因为我用2毫米直径产生了3微米误差.但是当我使用6毫米球形直径探针，误差达到了10个微米。（探针长度比先前大)
Some things to consider here.
Every probe ball ( stylus ) has some slight deviation from the nominal size.
There is also some pre-travel before the touch trigger probe sends the signal to the controller. How much depends on which touch trigger probe you have (
Renishaw TP2 , TP 20 , TP200 etc ).
As long as you are calibrating them against a CALIBRATED masterball ,
AND you have input the CALIBRATED masterball result ( from the certificate )
into your measuring software, you should not have to worry about a difference
of 7 microns between styli.
Remembering your attempts to calibrate the whole machine with gauge blocks,
I'd be surprised if you have the masterball calibrated. If you do, I stand corrected.
在这里需要考虑部分因素
每个实际探针与理论值都有一些微小的偏离。
探针将触发信号送到控制器之前，也有一些预行程。 行程的多少取决于你使用的测头.（Renishaw TP2,TP20,TP200 及其他）
只要你用标准器标准球来校正他们 ，
输入标准球的值（从证书）
打开你的测量软件，你没必要担忧探针偏差7个微米。
记得尝试用标准度块校正整个的机器，
如果你校正标准球,我将会感到惊讶。 如果你做了，我认错。
You need to get the basics of your machine correct 1st before questioning
any error or any accuracy issues you have.
询问之前你需要第一时间得到你的机器的偏差
无论任何错误或任何精度偏差。
Yes! the diameter of the tip ball gives an error which is known as "cosine error" see attached file.
I don't know what you are measuring but if you check a gauge block with tip dia. 2/6 it should NOT give you that difference in error!
Click here for Tip_points.pdf
是的,探针标准球给出一个误差以"cosine error "
我不知道你是怎么测量的，但是如果你用探针检查一个量块.但它不能给你偏差的不同！
点击这 Tip_points.pdf
If you're trying to check a 3D cone as a 2D dia at a certain Z level then, yes probe diameter will affect accuracy.
If you're look at roundness of a known round item, say a ring gage, then the size of the tip doesn't matter except that larger diameters tend to not be as round as smaller diameters but this is generally a relatively small difference.
The biggest thing that affects accuracy/repeatability/tri-lobing is the length of the stylus. It's much more complicated but generally speaking, if a 1" long stylus results in .0003 of tri-lobing, a 2" long stylus will be around .0006. The same basic concept applies to articulating probe heads. The longer the distance from the fulcrum to the prope tip, the more variance you will have when indexing the probe head. There are many other factors involved but the probe
length is by far the largest contributor. That is, assuming that cleanliness is under control.
如果你尝试在其中特定z值平面内用一个2维测头测量一个3D立体圆锥体.那么探针直径将会影响精度。
如果你是检查已知项目的圆，例如环规，那么与探针的大小是没有关系的.除了一点小的不同,结果中较大的直径不容易像较小的直径一样的圆。
对精度/重复度/偏差影响的最大的是探针的长度.这是更多复杂的,但一般来说，如果这 1" 长的探针误差为.0003偏差, 2" 长的探针将会是.0006 左右. 相同道理适用于关节臂测头。 从支点到探针顶端的距离越长，你标定的测头偏差越多。还牵涉许多其他的因素，但是探针长度是显然最大的因素。 如果其他因素可控的话 未完待续
回国际化:发展方向不同嘛,你所看必威APP精装版下载人气明显还是比较旺的 学英文 又能长知识 不错 未完待续
回国际化:发展方向不同嘛,你所看必威APP精装版下载人气明显还是比较旺的
吟啸徐行 发表于 2009-3-11 23:22 http://bbs.cmiw.cn/images/common/back.gif上次，他们请我写一份意见建议，我把这个网址(足球竞彩投注app哪个好0提交给他们，让美国人看看我们的必威APP精装版下载是多么的强大